<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco &#8211; Dual Internet Connections without BGP enabled ISP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/</link>
	<description>Tips and Video Tutorials - Cisco .:. Linux .:. VOIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariano</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-33069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-33069</guid>
		<description>I have one of my connections through a MPLS and the second one through a VPN. How I make the traffic goes into the VPN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of my connections through a MPLS and the second one through a VPN. How I make the traffic goes into the VPN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaizer Onion &#124; Think thoroughly about &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco multiple ISP avec IP SLA</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-32771</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaizer Onion &#124; Think thoroughly about &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cisco multiple ISP avec IP SLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-32771</guid>
		<description>[...] : http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : <a href="http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp" rel="nofollow">http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T O</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-32612</link>
		<dc:creator>T O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-32612</guid>
		<description>Hi,

track 101 rtr 1 reachability  command is not supported in c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin IOS.

In which IOS it is supported?

TIA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>track 101 rtr 1 reachability  command is not supported in c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin IOS.</p>
<p>In which IOS it is supported?</p>
<p>TIA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-29727</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-29727</guid>
		<description>Joaquin,

The first thing i notice is that Fa0/0 is referencing access-list 2000 but access-list 2000 does not exist.

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joaquin,</p>
<p>The first thing i notice is that Fa0/0 is referencing access-list 2000 but access-list 2000 does not exist.</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-28030</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-28030</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh,

Great tutorial, I learned a lot. My scenario is little bit diferent: I have two ISP connections (2 x G703-E1, same ISP) and in the LAN interface I have several VLANs (Vlan 3 for link 1 vlan 4 for link 2) The ISP provide me in the link 1 3 public IP subnets (64, 32 and 8 IPs) and 1 public IP subnet (8 IPs) in the link 2. When I applied your config with some changes I have problems because some webpages open and answers ping others no. For instance I can open yahoo.com, but i cannot open google.com. I´m appreciate if you can take look of my config:
ip sla monitor 1
 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 190.202.70.157
 threshold 3
 frequency 5
ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip sla monitor 2
 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 190.202.72.185
 threshold 3
 frequency 5
ip sla monitor schedule 2 life forever start-time now
track 101 rtr 1 reachability
!
track 102 rtr 2 reachability
interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0
 ip access-group 2000 in
 ip access-group 2000 out
 speed auto
 full-duplex
interface FastEthernet0/0.3
 encapsulation dot1Q 3
 ip address 192.168.30.10 255.255.255.0 secondary
 ip address 190.202.127.1 255.255.255.192 secondary
 ip address 190.202.108.57 255.255.255.248 secondary
 ip address 190.202.126.193 255.255.255.224 secondary
 ip address 172.40.0.1 255.255.0.0
 ip access-group 103 in
 ip access-group 103 out
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip nat inside
 ip virtual-reassembly
 no ip mroute-cache
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface FastEthernet0/0.4
 encapsulation dot1Q 4
 ip address 190.202.112.105 255.255.255.248 secondary
 ip address 172.41.0.1 255.255.0.0
 ip access-group 104 in
 ip access-group 104 out
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip nat inside
 ip virtual-reassembly
 no ip mroute-cache
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0/0/0:0
 bandwidth 1920
 ip address 190.202.70.158 255.255.255.252
 ip nat outside
 ip virtual-reassembly
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 frame-relay interface-dlci 487
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/0/1:0
 bandwidth 1920
 ip address 190.202.72.186 255.255.255.252
 ip nat outside
 ip virtual-reassembly
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 frame-relay interface-dlci 590
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
ip route profile
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 190.202.70.157 track 101
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 190.202.72.185 track 102
ip nat inside source route-map enlace1 interface Serial0/0/0:0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map enlace2 interface Serial0/0/1:0 overload
access-list 103 permit ip 172.40.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
access-list 103 permit ip any 172.40.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.127.0 0.0.0.63 any
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.127.0 0.0.0.63
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.126.192 0.0.0.31 any
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.126.192 0.0.0.31
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.108.56 0.0.0.7 any
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.108.56 0.0.0.7
access-list 103 permit ip 192.168.10.8 0.0.0.7 any
access-list 103 permit icmp any any
access-list 103 permit udp any any eq bootps
access-list 103 deny   ip any any
access-list 104 permit ip 172.41.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
access-list 104 permit ip any 172.41.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 104 permit udp any any eq bootps
access-list 104 permit ip 190.202.112.104 0.0.0.7 any
access-list 104 permit ip any 190.202.112.104 0.0.0.7
access-list 104 permit icmp any any
access-list 104 deny   ip any any
route-map enlace1 permit 10
 match ip address 103
 match interface Serial0/0/0:0
!
route-map enlace2 permit 10
 match ip address 104
 set interface Serial0/0/1:0
 set ip next-hop 190.202.72.185
!
The test was done with subnets 172.40.0.0 and 172.41.0.0 (DHCP asigned by router)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>Great tutorial, I learned a lot. My scenario is little bit diferent: I have two ISP connections (2 x G703-E1, same ISP) and in the LAN interface I have several VLANs (Vlan 3 for link 1 vlan 4 for link 2) The ISP provide me in the link 1 3 public IP subnets (64, 32 and 8 IPs) and 1 public IP subnet (8 IPs) in the link 2. When I applied your config with some changes I have problems because some webpages open and answers ping others no. For instance I can open yahoo.com, but i cannot open google.com. I´m appreciate if you can take look of my config:<br />
ip sla monitor 1<br />
 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 190.202.70.157<br />
 threshold 3<br />
 frequency 5<br />
ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now<br />
ip sla monitor 2<br />
 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 190.202.72.185<br />
 threshold 3<br />
 frequency 5<br />
ip sla monitor schedule 2 life forever start-time now<br />
track 101 rtr 1 reachability<br />
!<br />
track 102 rtr 2 reachability<br />
interface FastEthernet0/0<br />
 ip address 192.168.12.1 255.255.255.0<br />
 ip access-group 2000 in<br />
 ip access-group 2000 out<br />
 speed auto<br />
 full-duplex<br />
interface FastEthernet0/0.3<br />
 encapsulation dot1Q 3<br />
 ip address 192.168.30.10 255.255.255.0 secondary<br />
 ip address 190.202.127.1 255.255.255.192 secondary<br />
 ip address 190.202.108.57 255.255.255.248 secondary<br />
 ip address 190.202.126.193 255.255.255.224 secondary<br />
 ip address 172.40.0.1 255.255.0.0<br />
 ip access-group 103 in<br />
 ip access-group 103 out<br />
 no ip unreachables<br />
 no ip proxy-arp<br />
 ip nat inside<br />
 ip virtual-reassembly<br />
 no ip mroute-cache<br />
 no snmp trap link-status<br />
 no cdp enable<br />
interface FastEthernet0/0.4<br />
 encapsulation dot1Q 4<br />
 ip address 190.202.112.105 255.255.255.248 secondary<br />
 ip address 172.41.0.1 255.255.0.0<br />
 ip access-group 104 in<br />
 ip access-group 104 out<br />
 no ip unreachables<br />
 no ip proxy-arp<br />
 ip nat inside<br />
 ip virtual-reassembly<br />
 no ip mroute-cache<br />
 no snmp trap link-status<br />
 no cdp enable<br />
!<br />
interface Serial0/0/0:0<br />
 bandwidth 1920<br />
 ip address 190.202.70.158 255.255.255.252<br />
 ip nat outside<br />
 ip virtual-reassembly<br />
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF<br />
 frame-relay interface-dlci 487<br />
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi<br />
!<br />
interface Serial0/0/1:0<br />
 bandwidth 1920<br />
 ip address 190.202.72.186 255.255.255.252<br />
 ip nat outside<br />
 ip virtual-reassembly<br />
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF<br />
 frame-relay interface-dlci 590<br />
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi<br />
!<br />
ip route profile<br />
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 190.202.70.157 track 101<br />
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 190.202.72.185 track 102<br />
ip nat inside source route-map enlace1 interface Serial0/0/0:0 overload<br />
ip nat inside source route-map enlace2 interface Serial0/0/1:0 overload<br />
access-list 103 permit ip 172.40.0.0 0.0.255.255 any<br />
access-list 103 permit ip any 172.40.0.0 0.0.255.255<br />
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.127.0 0.0.0.63 any<br />
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.127.0 0.0.0.63<br />
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.126.192 0.0.0.31 any<br />
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.126.192 0.0.0.31<br />
access-list 103 permit ip 190.202.108.56 0.0.0.7 any<br />
access-list 103 permit ip any 190.202.108.56 0.0.0.7<br />
access-list 103 permit ip 192.168.10.8 0.0.0.7 any<br />
access-list 103 permit icmp any any<br />
access-list 103 permit udp any any eq bootps<br />
access-list 103 deny   ip any any<br />
access-list 104 permit ip 172.41.0.0 0.0.255.255 any<br />
access-list 104 permit ip any 172.41.0.0 0.0.255.255<br />
access-list 104 permit udp any any eq bootps<br />
access-list 104 permit ip 190.202.112.104 0.0.0.7 any<br />
access-list 104 permit ip any 190.202.112.104 0.0.0.7<br />
access-list 104 permit icmp any any<br />
access-list 104 deny   ip any any<br />
route-map enlace1 permit 10<br />
 match ip address 103<br />
 match interface Serial0/0/0:0<br />
!<br />
route-map enlace2 permit 10<br />
 match ip address 104<br />
 set interface Serial0/0/1:0<br />
 set ip next-hop 190.202.72.185<br />
!<br />
The test was done with subnets 172.40.0.0 and 172.41.0.0 (DHCP asigned by router)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-25648</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-25648</guid>
		<description>I am trying to do this on a 1751 running 12.2(15)T11.  I dont have ip sla command. Is there a min version I need to be running?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to do this on a 1751 running 12.2(15)T11.  I dont have ip sla command. Is there a min version I need to be running?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwk</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-18809</link>
		<dc:creator>iwk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-18809</guid>
		<description>Hi -

I&#039;m french, sorry for my english

Your configuration works for fail over, but for a simetric load balancing ?

If two ISPs is up, only the ISP n°1 is used ?

Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi -</p>
<p>I&#8217;m french, sorry for my english</p>
<p>Your configuration works for fail over, but for a simetric load balancing ?</p>
<p>If two ISPs is up, only the ISP n°1 is used ?</p>
<p>Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-17462</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-17462</guid>
		<description>jdm,

Yes, it will work with the interfaces you mentioned.

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jdm,</p>
<p>Yes, it will work with the interfaces you mentioned.</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdm</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-17185</link>
		<dc:creator>jdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-17185</guid>
		<description>Will this work using S0 and FastE?  Leased line and pppoe/dsl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this work using S0 and FastE?  Leased line and pppoe/dsl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/cisco-dual-internet-connections-without-bgp/comment-page-1/#comment-15512</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=7#comment-15512</guid>
		<description>Hi -- Great article.  I&#039;m having some trouble accessing both of my public interfaces from the outside.  I seem to only be able to get to the primary one.  Any help would be greatly appreciated !!

track 123 ip sla 1 reachability
track 345 ip sla 2 reachability

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet 0/0 [ISP GATEWAY 1] track 123
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet 0/1 [ISP GATEWAY 2] track 345 10

ip nat inside source route-map isp1-map interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map isp2-map interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload


ip sla 1
 icmp-echo [TEST IP 1] source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 timeout 1000
 threshold 2
 frequency 1
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now

ip sla 2
 icmp-echo [TEST IP 2] source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 timeout 1000
 threshold 2
 frequency 1
ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now

route-map isp2-map permit 10
 match ip address nat-list
 match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
!
route-map isp1-map permit 10
 match ip address nat-list
 match interface GigabitEthernet0/0

Hope I included all the relevant info.  When the failover link goes on, I can ssh into it.  But never when the primary link is up.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8212; Great article.  I&#8217;m having some trouble accessing both of my public interfaces from the outside.  I seem to only be able to get to the primary one.  Any help would be greatly appreciated !!</p>
<p>track 123 ip sla 1 reachability<br />
track 345 ip sla 2 reachability</p>
<p>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet 0/0 [ISP GATEWAY 1] track 123<br />
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet 0/1 [ISP GATEWAY 2] track 345 10</p>
<p>ip nat inside source route-map isp1-map interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload<br />
ip nat inside source route-map isp2-map interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload</p>
<p>ip sla 1<br />
 icmp-echo [TEST IP 1] source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0<br />
 timeout 1000<br />
 threshold 2<br />
 frequency 1<br />
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now</p>
<p>ip sla 2<br />
 icmp-echo [TEST IP 2] source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1<br />
 timeout 1000<br />
 threshold 2<br />
 frequency 1<br />
ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now</p>
<p>route-map isp2-map permit 10<br />
 match ip address nat-list<br />
 match interface GigabitEthernet0/1<br />
!<br />
route-map isp1-map permit 10<br />
 match ip address nat-list<br />
 match interface GigabitEthernet0/0</p>
<p>Hope I included all the relevant info.  When the failover link goes on, I can ssh into it.  But never when the primary link is up.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
