<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the Cisco Unified Reporting Tool in CUCM 7.x to verify Replication Status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blindhog.net/using-the-cisco-unified-reporting-tool-in-cucm-7-x-to-verify-replication-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blindhog.net/using-the-cisco-unified-reporting-tool-in-cucm-7-x-to-verify-replication-status/</link>
	<description>Tips and Video Tutorials - Cisco .:. Linux .:. VOIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kittu</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/using-the-cisco-unified-reporting-tool-in-cucm-7-x-to-verify-replication-status/comment-page-1/#comment-32640</link>
		<dc:creator>Kittu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=875#comment-32640</guid>
		<description>Can someone please confirm if &quot;All servers have a replication count of 425&quot; means that the publisher and subscribers have got their database replicated 425 times?But I remember the field services team adding/deleting more than 1500 phones.Not all at once,but surely minor changes have been done more than 425 times.So during this time where did the changes got saved to before it got replicated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please confirm if &#8220;All servers have a replication count of 425&#8243; means that the publisher and subscribers have got their database replicated 425 times?But I remember the field services team adding/deleting more than 1500 phones.Not all at once,but surely minor changes have been done more than 425 times.So during this time where did the changes got saved to before it got replicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/using-the-cisco-unified-reporting-tool-in-cucm-7-x-to-verify-replication-status/comment-page-1/#comment-32615</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=875#comment-32615</guid>
		<description>The Unified Database status can also be checked from the CUCM server command line with &#039;show perf&#039; command below.  You have to do it per server.

Replicate Count is not applicable.  If the Replicate_State is 2, your replication is good.  

This is the same info (see MAJOR disadvantage section below) as the Unified Reporting Database Status.  Check the Database Status page and you&#039;ll see a legend/explanation of the Replicate_State value.

admin:   show perf query class &quot;Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication&quot;
==&gt;query class :

 - Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has instances and values:
    ReplicateCount  -&gt; Number of Replicates Created   = 297
    ReplicateCount  -&gt; Replicate_State                = 2

There is a MAJOR disadvantage to the Unified Reporting Database Status page.  The page does not automatically refresh every time you call up the page.  You must manually upload the report if you want current information.  Remember to upload the report every time you view a report, or you will be looking at the information from the last time you uploaded the report.  And you may go months (years?) without uploading a report.  I went a month trying to figure out what was wrong with a new subscriber because I didn&#039;t upload a new repot &amp; the report had old information in the Database Status report.  New subscriber never showed as replicating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Unified Database status can also be checked from the CUCM server command line with &#8216;show perf&#8217; command below.  You have to do it per server.</p>
<p>Replicate Count is not applicable.  If the Replicate_State is 2, your replication is good.  </p>
<p>This is the same info (see MAJOR disadvantage section below) as the Unified Reporting Database Status.  Check the Database Status page and you&#8217;ll see a legend/explanation of the Replicate_State value.</p>
<p>admin:   show perf query class &#8220;Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication&#8221;<br />
==>query class :</p>
<p> &#8211; Perf class (Number of Replicates Created and State of Replication) has instances and values:<br />
    ReplicateCount  -> Number of Replicates Created   = 297<br />
    ReplicateCount  -> Replicate_State                = 2</p>
<p>There is a MAJOR disadvantage to the Unified Reporting Database Status page.  The page does not automatically refresh every time you call up the page.  You must manually upload the report if you want current information.  Remember to upload the report every time you view a report, or you will be looking at the information from the last time you uploaded the report.  And you may go months (years?) without uploading a report.  I went a month trying to figure out what was wrong with a new subscriber because I didn&#8217;t upload a new repot &#038; the report had old information in the Database Status report.  New subscriber never showed as replicating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aamir</title>
		<link>http://www.blindhog.net/using-the-cisco-unified-reporting-tool-in-cucm-7-x-to-verify-replication-status/comment-page-1/#comment-32608</link>
		<dc:creator>Aamir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blindhog.net/?p=875#comment-32608</guid>
		<description>Nice one...it would be a good idea to check replication via GUI at the very beginning of the lab!

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one&#8230;it would be a good idea to check replication via GUI at the very beginning of the lab!</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
